The head of British Cycling had publcily revealed his plans for the new unit when he launched his manifesto in Paris on Monday (June 24) only for Pat McQuaid, the UCI President who is seeking to win a third term, to try to claim that it would not be allowed under the rules of the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA).

McQuaid's case, however, was badly undermined yesterday when WADA confirmed to insidethegames that he was wrong and it would be permitted.

"There is no reason why such a model cannot be put in place internationally so that the UCI can fulfil its WADA Code obligations through an independently run organisation which has fully autonomous powers of decision making," Cookson writes in his latest blog published today. 

"There is precedent too, with SportAccord managing anti-doping programmess for some smaller IFs (International Federations), while others such as the International Ski Federation currently outsource large portions of their anti-doping programmes.

"As WADA have confirmed, there aren't any provisions in the World Anti-Doping Code that prevent the UCI from setting up an independent anti-doping programme.

"So, despite what has been said, this is perfectly possible."

Under Cookson's plans the independent anti-doping unit would exist outside the UCI's headquarters. 

"To be properly independent it needs to be physically and politically separate from the UCI, applying the UCI anti-doping rules and led by a trusted high profile chief executive who reports to a Board made up of a range of well respected professionals and representatives with different areas of expertise and experience," Cookson writes.

"This would include people with legal, scientific, administration and education expertise and some with experience in the anti-doping area.

"The number of tests and athletes in the Registered Testing Pool, as well as the level and sources of funding would all be fully published.

"The UCI would be able to challenge its decisions in CAS (Court of Arbitration for Sport)/open forum but not privately."


Among those Cookson has sought advice from is Gripper, the architect of the biological passport which disgraced seven-time Tour de France winner Lance Armstrong has admitted that if it exsisted while he was competing he would have been unable to avoid detection, and Nicki Vance, one of the start-up directors of WADA.

Andy Parkinson, chief executive of UK Anti-Doping, has also been consulted.

"In developing these policies, we have been talking to leading experts who have been, or currently are, involved in senior positions in anti-doping in sport or cycling," writes Cookson.

"We also have the recommendations of the recent Deloitte consultation which showed the number one priority being that, 'The UCI must take the steps necessary to restore cycling's and its own credibility, in particular in relation to the public perception of cycling's anti doping measures and current leadership'.

"We need to listen and work collaboratively to make these changes.

"As my manifesto states, 'We can't afford another false start and more broken promises'."

Contact the writer of this story at [email protected]


Related stories
June 2013: Exclusive - There is nothing to stop UCI setting up independent anti-doping unit, WADA rule
June 2013: McQuaid's verdict on Cookson's manifesto: "Half baked, fundamentally flawed and financially impractical"
June 2013: Cookson promises "financial transparency" as he launches campaign manifesto
June 2013: McQuaid claims Swiss nomination for UCI President is "secure"
June 2013: Armstrong quizzes Cookson on Twitter over plans for "truth and reconciliation" process